Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: St : Regression discontinuity with Dichotomous dependent variable
From
Nick Sanders <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: St : Regression discontinuity with Dichotomous dependent variable
Date
Tue, 3 Jan 2012 15:05:59 -0600
I bow to those with greater knowledge, but I imagine one could simply specify (assuming the treatment occurs if the running variable is greater than the cutoff):
gen pastcut = running > cut
gen runXpast = running * pastcut
reg outcome running pastcut runXpast
which is just a local linear regression (without covariates) and the coefficient on pastcut is interpretable as the impact of the treatment.
While there is a risk a predicted value might fall outside 0 and 1, I think that is generally accepted as ignorable unless you face many unusual values.
On Jan 3, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Cameron McIntosh <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think this deck might be helpful:
> Nichols, A. (July 14, 2011). Causal inference for binary regression. http://www.stata.com/meeting/chicago11/materials/chi11_nichols.pdf
>
> Cam
> ----------------------------------------
>> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 12:41:32 -0800
>> From: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: st: St : Regression discontinuity with Dichotomous dependent variable
>> To: [email protected]
>>
>> HI Nick
>> This is exactly correct. I am not sure about the polynomial.
>>
>> Also, while it is possible to model a 0/1 as a continuous with OLS, there is the risk that i would get values outside the 0/1 range.
>> Thanks
>> Ayman
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Nick Sanders
>> To: "[email protected]"
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2012 11:19 AM
>> Subject: Re: st: St : Regression discontinuity with Dichotomous dependent variable
>>
>> Hello Ayman,
>>
>> If I understand, you have a 0,1 variable as your outcome and a continuous running variable. You can do this with standard OLS and it is the classic RD setup. Perhaps your concern is the polynomial choice in the running variable (independent)?
>>
>> On Jan 3, 2012, at 1:10 PM, Ayman Farahat wrote:
>>
>>> Hello;
>>>
>>> I am working on evaluating a treatment effect. The treatment assignment is based on a regression model that assigns a continuous score. Subjects that have a score greater than the cutoff are treated while those below are not treated. So it fits the RD design framework.
>>>
>>> However, the dependent variable is not a continuous response but rather a dichotomous variable; did the subject perform a certain action. I am using Austin Nichol's excellent RD package. However, the package assumes that the dependent variable is continuous and uses a polynomial to fit a local regression.
>>>
>>> Is there a way to extend RD to include dichotomous dependent variables?
>>> Thanks
>>> Ayman
>>> *
>>> * For searches and help try:
>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>
>> *
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>
>> *
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/