Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Question on graph twoway and graph combine
From
Lars Folkestad <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: Question on graph twoway and graph combine
Date
Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:57:02 +0100
Im not sure if it has anything to with anything or if in just being silly, but using the by option renders a graph where the groups are seperatet in the same graph, but in the same grid.
Using grc1leg , common y - you get two grids and the groups are visually easier to distinguish.
Mvh
Lars Folkestad
Den 07/12/2011 kl. 10.18 skrev "Nick Cox" <[email protected]>:
> That's good advice, but I don't understand why -by()- couldn't be used
> in the first place. What does any estimation process have to do with
> graphing?
>
> Nick
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Phil Clayton
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> You could try -findit grc1leg-
>>
>> On 07/12/2011, at 8:09 PM, Alberto R Osella wrote:
>>
>>> I'm using Stata 12.0 on W7. I've drawn two graphs (one for each sex) by using -graph twoway- and then I've combined them by using -graph combine-. I've drawn graphics separately because I can't using the by() option as a result of the estimation process. The resulting combine graph has two legends (the same) and I want a graph with only one legend.
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/