Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: GMM error (bug in Stata?)
From
"Schaffer, Mark E" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: GMM error (bug in Stata?)
Date
Sun, 30 Oct 2011 11:47:17 -0000
John,
I see from the output that after an iteration, the value of the GMM
objective function becomes very small, e.g., 1.656e-33 ... in other
words, zero.
This could happen if the model is exactly identified, or (if I remember
the discussion in Hall's GMM book correctly) if the rank of the VCV of
moment conditions is PSD instead of PD. Could either of these be the
explanation?
Cheers,
Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> John Antonakis
> Sent: 30 October 2011 05:54
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: st: GMM error (bug in Stata?)
>
> Hi Stas (and Cam):
>
> Thanks for the follow-up but its not the number of clusters
> that is causing the problem; I have 418 of them (refers to
> the output of the first note:
>
> Here is the output from the first gmm estimation:
> Step 1
> Iteration 0: GMM criterion Q(b) = 13.184222
> Iteration 1: GMM criterion Q(b) = 1.497e-26
> Iteration 2: GMM criterion Q(b) = 4.387e-32
>
> Step 2
> Iteration 0: GMM criterion Q(b) = 4.314e-33
> Iteration 1: GMM criterion Q(b) = 4.314e-33 (backed up)
>
> GMM estimation
>
> Number of parameters = 14
> Number of moments = 14
> Initial weight matrix: Unadjusted Number of obs
> = 3344
> GMM weight matrix: Cluster (lead_n)
>
> (Std. Err. adjusted for 418
> clusters in
> lead_n)
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> | Robust
> | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf.
> Interval]
> -------------+------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> -------------+------
> /b1 | 1.049204 .0549893 19.08 0.000
> .9414266
> 1.156981
> /b2 | 1.078344 .0586466 18.39 0.000
> .9633983
> 1.193289
> /b3 | .9043237 .0616768 14.66 0.000
> .7834394
> 1.025208
> /b4 | 1.04687 .0528909 19.79 0.000
> .9432057
> 1.150534
> /b5 | 1.043876 .0569363 18.33 0.000
> .9322833
> 1.155469
> /b6 | 1.01851 .0592967 17.18 0.000
> .9022906
> 1.134729
> /b7 | .9258437 .0602654 15.36 0.000
> .8077256
> 1.043962
> /b8 | .9485584 .0553715 17.13 0.000
> .8400322
> 1.057085
> /b9 | 1.066044 .0601146 17.73 0.000
> .9482216
> 1.183867
> /b10 | 1.075929 .0577217 18.64 0.000
> .9627967
> 1.189062
> /b11 | 1.017601 .0614807 16.55 0.000
> .8971007
> 1.138101
> /b12 | -.9610472 .0526738 -18.25 0.000 -1.064286
> -.8578085
> /b13 | -.9627249 .0589321 -16.34 0.000 -1.07823
> -.8472202
> /b0 | -.1096011 .0587362 -1.87 0.062
> -.2247219
> .0055198
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> Instruments for equation 1: x_fe1 x_fe2 x_fe3 x_fe4 x_fe5 x_fe6 x_fe7
> x_fe8 x_fe9 x_fe10
> x_fe11 x_fe12 x_fe13 _cons
>
> Here's the output from the second gmm estimation:
>
> Step 1
> Iteration 0: GMM criterion Q(b) = 12.045213
> Iteration 1: GMM criterion Q(b) = 2.209e-26
> Iteration 2: GMM criterion Q(b) = 1.786e-32
>
> Step 2
> Iteration 0: GMM criterion Q(b) = 1.883e-33
> Iteration 1: GMM criterion Q(b) = 1.656e-33
>
> GMM estimation
>
> Number of parameters = 14
> Number of moments = 14
> Initial weight matrix: Unadjusted Number of obs
> = 3344
> GMM weight matrix: Cluster (lead_n)
>
> (Std. Err. adjusted for 418
> clusters in
> lead_n)
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> | Robust
> | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf.
> Interval]
> -------------+------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> -------------+------
> /c1 | .9598146 .0517448 18.55 0.000
> .8583967
> 1.061232
> /c2 | .9256337 .0535588 17.28 0.000
> .8206605
> 1.030607
> /c3 | .8305105 .0582733 14.25 0.000
> .7162969
> .9447241
> /c4 | .956631 .0482825 19.81 0.000
> .8619991
> 1.051263
> /c5 | .9736638 .053159 18.32 0.000
> .8694742
> 1.077853
> /c6 | .9493385 .0541098 17.54 0.000
> .8432853
> 1.055392
> /c7 | .8518398 .0555893 15.32 0.000
> .7428867
> .9607929
> /c8 | .8813955 .051279 17.19 0.000
> .7808906
> .9819004
> /c9 | .9793823 .0518981 18.87 0.000
> .877664
> 1.081101
> /c10 | .9923967 .0533734 18.59 0.000
> .8877868
> 1.097007
> /c11 | .8911549 .0555809 16.03 0.000
> .7822183
> 1.000092
> /c12 | -.865805 .0502334 -17.24 0.000 -.9642607
> -.7673493
> /c13 | -.8909156 .0537489 -16.58 0.000 -.9962615
> -.7855697
> /c0 | -.1046114 .0564682 -1.85 0.064
> -.2152871
> .0060643
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> Instruments for equation 1: x_clus1 x_clus2 x_clus3 x_clus4 x_clus5
> x_clus6 x_clus7 x_clus8
> x_clus9 x_clus10 x_clus11 x_clus12 x_clus13 _cons
>
> Best,
> J.
>
> __________________________________________
>
> Prof. John Antonakis
> Faculty of Business and Economics
> Department of Organizational Behavior
> University of Lausanne
> Internef #618
> CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny
> Switzerland
> Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
> Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305
> http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis
>
> Associate Editor
> The Leadership Quarterly
> __________________________________________
>
>
> On 30.10.2011 00:40, Stas Kolenikov wrote:
> > John,
> >
> > how many clusters do you have? May be you are running out
> of clusters > in estimation of the weight matrix if you have
> fewer clusters than > parameters.
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:56 AM, John Antonakis
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> The goal of my estimation procedure is to make cross
> model comparison, where >> the model have different
> instruments ( and given the clustering I have, I >> want to
> have a generalized Hausman test hence the use of gmm). I want
> to >> show that the second stage estimates don't change when
> I change the >> instruments....it's a simulation study I am
> working on, hence the >> "strangeness".
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
--
Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity
registered under charity number SC000278.
Heriot-Watt University is the Sunday Times
Scottish University of the Year 2011-2012
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/