Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Outreg2 and tobit
From
Abhimanyu Arora <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Outreg2 and tobit
Date
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:31:25 +0200
Making a humble addition to Prof Cox's sagacious advice, I would also
request you to post how you solved the problem yourself or following
Dr Wada's suggestions as it would not only indicate the closure of the
thread but also help future stata users.
Many thanks
Abhimanyu
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why no one among thousands wants to answer a question is at best a
> matter for conjecture.
>
> As has been pointed out before, -outreg2- (which is, as you do not
> explain, contrary to a long-standing and often repeated request on
> this list, is a user-written program, from SSC) is a popular
> download. However, its users often do not answer questions on it and
> its author is not a member of the list. Why the first is true I don't
> know: perhaps everyone leaves it to someone else or feels that though
> a user they are not an expert. I can't comment on your (a) or (b)
> because I have never used it for its purpose. (I did once use it to
> check out someone's problem with an error report.)
>
> I'd contact the author directly for support if no one offers a
> solution in response to this reminder, or use an alternative program.
>
> Nick
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Dorothy Bridges <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I'm sorry to bother the entire list again, but I'm hoping someone can
>> tell me whether no one has answered the below question because (a) the
>> solution is so obvious that I should have come to it on my own or
>> because (b) the solution is so obscure that it is not obvious to
>> anyone else. (If (a), I will keep working; if (b), I will abandon the
>> pursuit.)
>>
>> Thanks again,
>> Dorothy
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Dorothy Bridges <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> When I use outreg2 with tobit, outreg2 places the "sigma" estimate in
>>> a column alongside the coefficient estimates, rather than at the
>>> bottom of the column (where R^2 would appear). In other words, I am
>>> getting:
>>>
>>> (1) (2)
>>> model sigma
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rather than:
>>> (1)
>>> model
>>> variable1
>>> variable2
>>> ...
>>> sigma
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I was unable to find a solution either in the help files or in the
>>> Statalist archives.
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/