Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: Repeated Measures ANOVA and Missing Values
From
amir gahremanpour <[email protected]>
To
statalist <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: Repeated Measures ANOVA and Missing Values
Date
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:06:19 -0500
Dear Phil,
many thanks!
Amir
----------------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:10:09 -0700
> Subject: Re: RE: st: Repeated Measures ANOVA and Missing Values
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> so I suppose for repeated measures without missing values, xtmixed or
> r.anova are kind of the same thing !
> --------------------------
>
> Amir,
>
> Yes, -xtmixed, reml- without missing observations yields the exact
> same results as repeated measures anova. There are additional
> benefits to -xtmixed- even for complete data. -xymixed- allows for
> covariance structure other than compound symmetry (exchangeable), such
> as, ar1, using the -residuals- option. With -xtmixed- you can also
> have equally spaced time intervals that vary by subject.
>
> --
> Phil Ender
> UCLA Statistical Consulting Group
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/