Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: RE: st: Repeated Measures ANOVA and Missing Values
From
Philip Ender <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: Re: RE: st: Repeated Measures ANOVA and Missing Values
Date
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:56:47 -0700
<[email protected]> wrote:
what is considered to be small sample size for xtmixed? from what I
understood from you xtmixed Chicago lecture with small sample size
xtmixed may cause type I error, if I am correct please advise about a
good sample size (total sample size) for xtmixed.
----------------------
Dear Amir,
The issue is not the sample size for -xtmixed- but what sample size do
you need to have confidence in the chi-square p-values. I'm afraid
there is no simple easy answer to this question. Most experimental
designs tend to have relatively small sample sizes and report F-ratios
and associated p-values. If I don't have repeated measures, I use
-anova- or -regress-. However, for repeated measures with missing
observations I use -xtmixed-. Back when I was a S*S user I used -proc
mixed- which gives results as F-ratios with denominator degrees of
freedom. A lot of my psychology clients use S*SS -mixed- which also
yields F-ratios and p-values. I try to obtain the same results in
Stata, my preferred package, by estimating reasonable denominator
degrees of freedom.
--
Phil Ender
UCLA Statistical Consulting Group
"Money can't buy you happiness, but it can buy you a good statistical package."
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/