Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: multinomial multilevel analysis in Stata
From
Rosie Chen <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: multinomial multilevel analysis in Stata
Date
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:14:20 -0700 (PDT)
Nick, thanks very much for helpful response.
Rosie
----- Original Message -----
From: Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 6:06 AM
Subject: RE: st: multinomial multilevel analysis in Stata
This is one of the most frequent questions on this list. There are many answers, of which my favourite is to use -poisson- or -glm, link(log)- i.e. use a link function that indulges zeros in the data, not a transformation. However, if the zeros arise from some quite distinct process, you may need something more complicated.
Nick
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rosie Chen
Sent: 15 October 2011 15:18
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: multinomial multilevel analysis in Stata
Thank you, Cam. I will read the articles mentioned below. What would you suggest for dealing with zero values when log transforming data?
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/