Re: st: xtreg, fe and xtlogit, fe

[natasha agarwal <agarwana2@googlemail.com>]

I did the xtreg model without the clustering of standard errors and it
still gives me the same result. But I guess you are right different
models with different assumptions can altogether yield different
results.

Natasha

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Nick Sanders <sandersn@stanford.edu> wrote:
> Hello Natasha,
>
> Different models (e.g. OLS vs. nonlinear models) can get different results, and I can't claim a deep understanding about how xtlogit works, but part of the difference could be driven by something as simple as your standard error specification. In the xtreg model, your standard errors are "robust", which for xtreg translates to clustered standard errors (if I remember correctly). As the xtlogit specification isn't doing any standard error correction.
>
> Best,
> Nick
>
> On Oct 13, 2011, at 7:04 AM, natasha agarwal wrote:
>
>> Dear Everyone,
>>
>> I was trying to estimate the following model
>>
>> xtreg x  a y y*g, fe vce(robust)
>> xtlogit x a y y*g, fe
>>
>> I get that the both y and the interaction term is insignificant in the
>> xtreg, fe model while y is significant and the interaction term is
>> insignificant in the xtlogit, fe model.
>>
>> I fail to understand the discrepancy I observe in the results.
>>
>> Can anyone help with this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Natasaha
>> *
>> *   For searches and help try:
>> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> \
>
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/