Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: xtreg, fe and xtlogit, fe
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: xtreg, fe and xtlogit, fe
Date
Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:11:16 +0100
You are fitting quite different models here. Without knowing anything
about your data, it is quite possible that at least one makes little
sense, depending on the nature of your response variable. But even if
both make sense, discrepant results don't seem surprising at all.
Orthogonally to all that:
1. It is difficult to comment on your results when you just describe
them verbally.
2. Plot your results in as many ways as you can to try to see what is going on.
Nick
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:04 PM, natasha agarwal
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I was trying to estimate the following model
>
> xtreg x a y y*g, fe vce(robust)
> xtlogit x a y y*g, fe
>
> I get that the both y and the interaction term is insignificant in the
> xtreg, fe model while y is significant and the interaction term is
> insignificant in the xtlogit, fe model.
>
> I fail to understand the discrepancy I observe in the results.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/