Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Interpretation of nldecompose regression output
From
Maarten Buis <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Interpretation of nldecompose regression output
Date
Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:02:54 +0200
Those questions are answered in the article, to which you do have
access if you are willing to pay $8.75, or you can wait a couple of
months till the moving wall passes and the article becomes free.
-- Maarten
--- On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Ilaria Maselli wrote:
> Unfortunately I do not have access, but I checked the presentation about
> this: http://www.stata.com/meeting/5german/SINNING_stata_presentation.pdf
> Two things are not clear:
> - which is the true result: the one with Omega = 0 or Omega = 1?
> - why there is no significance level like in the output of the Oaxaca
> command?
> - how to interpret the coefficient. For example, taking omega=1, does it
> mean that 25% of the wage differential is due to different characteristics
> and 75% to discrimination?
--- On Thursday, October 13, 2011 2:26 PM Maarten Buis wrote:
> Did you read the article which introduced -nldecompose-?
>
> M. Sinning, M. Hahn, and T. K. Bauer (2008) "The Blinder-Oaxaca
> decomposition for nonlinear regression models" The Stata Journal,
> 8(4): 480-492.
--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/