Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |
To | "'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu'" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | st: RE: Relative survival - strel |
Date | Thu, 6 Oct 2011 11:39:14 +0100 |
As -strel- is not found by -findit-, it is especially important to explain to those curious where it comes from. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Sam Leary I am a bit of a novice at survival analysis, but am trying to calculate relative survival using strel. My variables are death_5y = 1 if died by 5 years after diagnosis, 0 if still alive at 5 years age_diag = age at diagnosis (years) age_death = age at death or 5 years, whichever came first (years) I have downloaded a lifetable which has the following variables: country calendar_year sex age rate and I have only kept the data for the calendar year relating to the start date of my audit. I have also sorted this file by age then sex. So I have used the following commands to calculate the crude and relative survival at 5 years after diagnosis: stset age_death, failure(death_5y) origin(age_diag) strel 0 5 using "ltab_s1",mergeby(sex) My question is, as there are 257 deaths out of a total of 468, why is the crude survival percentage 41.86 using strel, rather than (468-257)/468 = 45.1? * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/