Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Shourjo Chakravorty <shourjo@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: Backed-up message on last iteration |
Date | Tue, 4 Oct 2011 11:42:43 -0400 |
I'm sorry I just saw your example. I will try it now. Thanks again. On 4 October 2011 11:40, Shourjo Chakravorty <shourjo@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Austin, > > The method you suggested is exactly what I have been doing. I still > get the backed-up message on the last iteration when using the > estimated coef vector as the starting point. Although in this case I > have the options "partial", "technique()" and "difficult" on. Should I > turn them off and do the biprobit estimation with the estimated > coefficient vector as the starting point? And also if these results > cannot be trusted, should I be checking the gradient vector? > > Shourjo > > On 4 October 2011 10:18, Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com> wrote: >> Shourjo Chakravorty <shourjo@gmail.com> : >> >> What happens when you restart -biprobit- without the options, using >> the estimated coef vector as your starting point? >> >> webuse school, clear >> biprobit private vote logptax loginc years, tech(bfgs) >> mat b=e(b) >> biprobit private vote logptax loginc years, from(b) >> >> Only you can clarify your confusion. >> >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Shourjo Chakravorty <shourjo@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Btw I am using Stata11. >>> >>> On 3 October 2011 22:02, Shourjo Chakravorty <shourjo@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I am estimating a partially-observable biprobit model with the dfp and >>>> bfgs techniques.Sometimes I get the "backed-up message" on the last >>>> iteration. I've read the archives here and it says I can trust the >>>> results. I am asking because in the book by Gould, Pitblando and Poi >>>> (2010) "maximum likelihood estimation with stata" it states that I >>>> cannot trust the results if the last iteration has this message (page >>>> 20). I am a beginner and would be grateful if someone could clarify my >>>> confusion. >>>> >> * >> * For searches and help try: >> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq >> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ >> > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/