Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: missing cases in aggregation
From
Abu Camara <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: RE: missing cases in aggregation
Date
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 17:19:24 +0300
Nick,
Many thanks Nick. Your suggestion works fine.
Abu.
On 3 October 2011 13:55, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> This won't work this way. -missing()- just returns 0 or 1; it will not count missings across observations. You need to construct a variable that includes the counts. -egen- includes various functions that might help.
>
> Nick
> [email protected]
>
> Abu Camara
>
> I am doing some aggregation on some indicators by region and would
> like to have no aggregation
> for year if 1/3 of cases for particular year are missing. I tried the
> following command but did not
> get what I wanted. Any suggestion /help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
>
> ***--command----------.
> table country year [aweight=pop1] if year==1980 | year==1990
> |year==2000 | year>=2004 & missing(year)>19, ///
> c(mean ger_pri_tot) format(%9.1f) row
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
--
Best Wishes,
Abu Camara
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/