Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: MI mvn with categorical data
From
Andrea Bennett <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: MI mvn with categorical data
Date
Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:35:26 +0200
MVN is generally seen to be superior to ICE/chained which is why I try to go that rout. The procedure I cite is exactly for the case I mention. It is in no way inappropriate, neither for my data nor for MVN. I just cannot get it to work with Stata, properly.
On Sep 30, 2011, at 16:08 , Stas Kolenikov wrote:
> If you have Stata 12+, you'd want to explore -mi impute chained-. If
> you have Stata 11.99-, you would want to take a look at -ice- by
> Patrick Royston. There is little sense to use the tool that you
> yourself know to be inappropriate. If Enders ignores Stata in his
> book, it means you have to explore it on your own and find the best
> performing methods that may not be even mentioned in that book.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/