Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: Looping across observations (forwards and backwards)


From   pedromfn <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   st: Looping across observations (forwards and backwards)
Date   Sat, 24 Sep 2011 07:28:46 -0700 (PDT)

Dear statalisters

My database looks like:

obs cod pr qt sinalt
1 1 1.4 100 .
2 2 1.5 100 .
3 1 1.5 95 .
4 1 1.4 100 .
5 3 1.5 100 .

and I want to replace observations of sinalt in which cod==3, according to
the following rule:
1) Go across observations looking for observations in which cod=3
2) In the above example, the first observation is observation 5, in which
pr[5]=1.5 and qt[5]=100. Once that observation was found, go backwards
through observations looking for the first observation j in which
pr[j]==pr[5] & qt[j]==qt[5]. In the example, j=2.
3) Replace sinalt[5]=`sinal' , where the macro sinal is defined as:
     if cod[j]==1, store in the local sinal the value 1
     if cod[j]==2, store in the local sinal the value -1
4) Once last replace was done, look for the next observation in which cod==3
and do the same thing.

I wrote the following do-file, but it didn't work:

forvalues i=1/`=_N' {
        if cod[`i']==3{
                local j=`i'-1
                if pr[`j']==pr[`i'] & qt[`j']==qt[`i'] {
                        if cod[j]==1 {
                                local sinal 1
                        }
                        else if cod[`j']==2 {
                                local sinal -1
                        }
                        else {
                                local sinal
                        }
                }
                else {
                        while pr[`j']!=pr[`i'] | qt[`j']!=qt[`i'] {
                                local --j
                        }
                }
        replace sinalt=`sinal' in `i'
        }
}

ERROR:
in not found
r(111);

Does someone know what went wrong?

Thanks very much

Best regards,
Pedro. 

--
View this message in context: http://statalist.1588530.n2.nabble.com/Looping-across-observations-forwards-and-backwards-tp6827249p6827249.html
Sent from the Statalist mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index