st: listcoef help command with negative binomial offset

[Brian Renauer <renauer@pdx.edu>]

I used a listcoef, help percent command after conducting a negative 
binomial regression (nbreg) with an offset of logged neighborhood 
population.  My question is whether the help interpretation provided by 
this command, "percent change in expected count for SD increase in X" is 
the proper wording for interpreting the coefficients in the model 
output.  In other words, did my use of an offset variable, which 
considers exposure rate, make the interpretation of the listcoef help 
statement incorrect?  Is it telling me the right wording, particularly 
the use of the word count?  Do I need to do some additional 
transformations to properly interpret the coefficients or the listcoef 
output? 

Any help is much appreciated - Brian Renauer
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/