Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: qladder
From
Ozgur Ozdemir <[email protected]>
To
Stata <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: qladder
Date
Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:35:29 +0000
Hi Nic,
It seems you are right, i have too many zeros but some of them are real zeros, and some of them are missing values. i am not sure how I can handle it.
kind regards
Ozgur Ozdemir
T: +44 (0) 75 0332 9865
E: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Skype : ozgurozdemir2005
----------------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:30:59 +0100
> Subject: Re: st: qladder
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
>
> The implication is that you have zeros in your data so that the
> transformations not plotted are not computable for all values. It is
> thus not clear that you are missing anything that could be useful.
>
> Nick
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Ozgur Ozdemir
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > when I use the qladder command, it does show only four graphs including cubic, square, identity and square root. but does not show i.e inverse, 1/square and some others. Is there any way that I can get others graphed?
> >
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/