Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: generalized test alternative to Hausman 3
From
"Schaffer, Mark E" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: generalized test alternative to Hausman 3
Date
Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:11:54 +0100
Pasquale,
Please see point #2 of my original email. All you've done is show us the output of the -hausman- command. I had a specific suggestion regarding the options for this command that you should try, but you haven't told us if you've tried it. Also, please reply to the list if you have a follow up question to this post, not to me personally.
--MS
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Schaffer, Mark E
> Sent: 06 September 2011 16:29
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: RE: generalized test alternative to Hausman
>
> Pasquale,
>
> A couple of thoughts...
>
> 1. It looks like you're using the old syntax of the
> -hausman- command. Is this because you have an old version
> of Stata? FIY, when posting to Statalist, you should
> normally say which version of you are using (see the FAQ,
> http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/statalist.html#stata).
>
> 2. The Hausman test stat can sometimes be <0 in finite
> samples because different estimates of the error variance are
> being used in V_b and V_B. You can force the same variance
> to be used in both with either the sigmamore or sigmaless
> options (depending on the version of Stata you have, hence
> the importance of telling us - see #1).
>
> HTH,
> Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pasquale Pazienza [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 16 September 2011 12:13
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Schaffer, Mark E
> Subject: generalized test alternative to Hausman 3
>
> Dear Mark,
>
> thanks again for your reply. While highlighting that STATA
> version 10 is the one I am using, I report the Hausman test
> result here below.
>
> Tab. Hausman test results.
> Coefficients
> (b) (B) (b-B)
> Sqrt (duag(v_b-V_B))
> fe . difference S.E.
> Ln_GDPsct_pw -.0793763 .0256665 -.1050429 .1291917
> Ln_GDPscr_pw2 -.000889 -.0030242 .0021352 .0033101
> Ln_FLWsct_pGDP -.0002738 -.0001679
> -.0001059 -
> Ln_SCTrel_2 .1359481 .166646 -.0306978 .0341267
> Ln_GCF_pw .1085437 .1586885 -.0501448 .0367002
> Ln_edu 1.906183 1.578326
> .3278571 .2079112
> Ln_MKTopn_2 -.164718 -.1369007 -.0278172 .0254818
> Ln_1_CRpr_GDP_1 -.0030535 -.0033269
> .0002734 -
>
> b = consistent under Ho and Ha; obtained from xtreg B =
> inconsistent under Ha, efficient under Ho; obtained from xtreg
>
> Test: Ho: difference in coefficients not systematic
> Chi2 (B) = (b-B) ' [(v_b-V_B)^(-1)] (b-B) = - 25.37 chi2 < 0
> ==> model fitted on these data fails to meet asymptotic
> assumptions of the Hausman test; see SUEST for a generalized test
>
>
>
> **************************************************************
> *************************
> WORK ADDRESSES:
>
> (in Italy) (in UK)
> Università degli Studi di Foggia Department of
> Economics and Finance
> Facoltà di Economia (DSEMS) Durham University
> Largo Papa Giovanni Paolo II n. 1 23/26 Old Elvet
> 71100 Foggia (Italy) Durham DH1 3HY
> E-mail: <[email protected]> E-mail:
> <[email protected]>
>
> 5 x 1000 - Campagna di Raccolta fondi 2011 a favore
> dell'Universita' degli Studi di Foggia Sostieni la Ricerca
> Scientifica per il futuro della nostra societa', dei nostri
> giovani, della scienza. Scegli di donare il 5 x 1000
> all'Universita' degli Studi di Foggia, nella tua
> dichiarazione dei redditi firma e inserisci il codice fiscale
> 94045260711
>
--
Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity
registered under charity number SC000278.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/