Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: Re: Non parametric anova
From
"Lachenbruch, Peter" <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: Re: Non parametric anova
Date
Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:53:18 -0700
Alternatively, you can replace the values with ranks and use anova
________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Cox [[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 8:45 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: Re: Non parametric anova
It's hard to see that Friedman can be appropriate but not -ologit-.
I'd use an analysis based on means and wave a flag of caution.
Nick
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Arti Rayit <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have any experiment which involves measuring pain scores on patients in the
> range 0(1)4 at 4 time periods with 2 drug therapies and I am stuck with the
> analysis. I considered ologit but I do not think that it is appropriate for
> repeated measures and I could find nothing in the 'xt' suite of programs. For
> each treatment Friedman (SJ-5-2) shows an effect of time but does not allow me
> to compare the treatments.
>
> I would be grateful for any advice. I am using Stata 12.
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/