Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: quasi-complete separation
From
"Joseph Coveney" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: quasi-complete separation
Date
Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:14:56 +0900
Sabrina Helmut wrote:
[snip]
y x
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 4
1 1
1 2
1 3
1 4
1 5
1 6
1 7
Thus, values of the independent variable being higher than 4 are only captured
by y=1. So, is this a problem of quasi-complete separation? Thank you very much.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No, that's not an example of quasi-complete separation.
To see an example of quasi-complete separation and Stata's reaction to it, look
at Slides 6 and 7 of www.stata.com/meeting/snasug08/coveney_snasug08.pps .
Joseph Coveney
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/