Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: - xtlogit- and predictnl and -xtreg-
From
Ricardo Ovaldia <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: - xtlogit- and predictnl and -xtreg-
Date
Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
I wold like to get XB estimates from -xtreg- at fixed points in time. I used a command similar to the one that Maarten suggested for -xtlogit-:
predictnl or = exp(_b[1.group] +_b[1.group#c.year]*c.year), ci(lb ub)
of course, I do not want the eform and my group variable has 3 levels instead of two so I used:
predictnl xbeta = _b[1.group] +_b[1.group#c.year]*c.year +_b[2.group] +_b[2.group#c.year]*c.year, ci(lb ub)
I do not get the correct estimates.
Thank you,
Ricardo
Ricardo Ovaldia, MS
Statistician
Oklahoma City, OK
--- On Wed, 8/17/11, Ricardo Ovaldia <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Ricardo Ovaldia <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: st: - xtlogit- and predictnl
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2011, 9:05 AM
> My mistake, you are correct Maarten,
> they should be symmetric, and they are, in the or scale.
>
> Okay, I think I got it. If I do not exp() the expression in
> -predictnl-, I will get the corret p-values.
>
> Thank you again,
> Ricardo
>
> Ricardo Ovaldia, MS
> Statistician
> Oklahoma City, OK
>
> Ricardo Ovaldia, MS
> Statistician
> Oklahoma City, OK
>
>
> --- On Wed, 8/17/11, Maarten Buis <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > From: Maarten Buis <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: st: - xtlogit- and predictnl
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2011, 8:49 AM
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:34 PM,
> > Ricardo Ovaldia wrote:
> > > predictnl or = exp(_b[1.group] +
> > _b[1.group#c.year]*c.year), ci(lb ub) p(pval)
> > >
> > > but included the extra optiop -p()- to obtain
> > p-values
> > >
> > > My question is why do the pvalues and the CI do
> not
> > agree?
> > > It seems like the CI are incorrect. They are not
> > symmetric in the log-scale.
> >
> > I guess that the null-hypothesis is that the odds
> ratio
> > equals 0,
> > which does not make sense in this case, but how is
> Stata
> > supposed to
> > know that our expression happens to be an odds ratio?
> The
> > confidence
> > interval is symmetric in the or scale rather than the
> > log(or) scale
> > because -predictnl- just applies the delta method on
> our
> > expression to
> > get the standard errors and than moves on to use these
> to
> > compute
> > confidence intervals.
> >
> > Hope this helps,
> > Maarten
> >
> > --------------------------
> > Maarten L. Buis
> > Institut fuer Soziologie
> > Universitaet Tuebingen
> > Wilhelmstrasse 36
> > 72074 Tuebingen
> > Germany
> >
> >
> > http://www.maartenbuis.nl
> > --------------------------
> > *
> > * For searches and help try:
> > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> >
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/