Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: problem running mfx after glm
From
"Sarah Edgington" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: problem running mfx after glm
Date
Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:38:49 -0700
You haven't given the list enough information to really help you.
What do you mean when you say it's giving you a problem? What error message
are you actually getting? Have you gotten a new version of Stata since you
last run the analysis? If so, have you tried running the dofile using the
-version- command?
Others may be able to help you with translating to -margins- but you should
be able to run your original analysis without rewriting it.
-Sarah
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marlis Gonzalez
Fernandez
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 3:27 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: st: problem running mfx after glm
Hello-
Did the following analysis last fall:
glm ReadingCompCombdiv100 education, family(binomial) link(logit) robust
followed by:
mfx, at(mean)
This provided me with the marginal effects after glm (variable of interest
is a proportion).
Any idea why this is giving me a problem.having trouble figuring out how to
do this using margins instead of mfx.
Thanks,
M González
JHU
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/