Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: R. notation
From
"Bontempo, Daniel E" <[email protected]>
To
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject
st: R. notation
Date
Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:38:09 +0000
I get slightly different results in xtmelogit with "|| Subj:" versus "|| _all R.Subj", and the differences increase if there is a 2nd crossed random effect.
Do these two notations specify the same model? ... but the differences stem from Laplacian approximation?
Also, I find the i. and c. notation documented under "fvvarlist", but where can I find documentation discussing R. notation?
Thanks
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/