Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Artificial censoring in survival analysis
From
[email protected]
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
st: Artificial censoring in survival analysis
Date
Tue, 2 Aug 2011 10:25:27 +0300
Hello statalisters,
I analyze employment data using survival method for a length of 12 months. I decided to do so because some of my observations are younger to experience the event (in this case exiting unemployment) for more than 12 months; that is I observe them only for 12 months. To overcome this problem I imposed a 12 months period of analysis for all of my observations. That is all observations have equal length of 12 months to experience the event. I did so by artificially censoring those observations for whom I have data for more than 12 months and did not experience the event within 12 months. These are old individuals. I did censor even though I see some of these observations experience the event later, after the 12 months period.
My questions:
1. Should I include in the analysis those observations that I censored?
2. Is the sample data presented below appropriate for survival analysis? Note that all of observations experience the event except those I censored at the 12 month.
Below is a small representation of my data. The failure variable 'Failure' is cross-tabulated with the variable 'studytime' which is the number of months until experiencing the event.
Failure
0 | 1
------
1 0 | 200
2 0 | 89
3 0 | 70
5 0 | 68
6 0 | 58
7 0 | 50
8 0 | 51
10 0 | 45
11 0 | 30
12 150 | 0
Thanks,
Melaku
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/