Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Phil1899@gmx.de |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: No valid instruments for system GMM |
Date | Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:58:36 +0200 |
Hi Natalie, have you checked the difference GMM estimator (Arelano-Bond)? It might be that the Hanson test fails because the additional moment restrictions used by the system estimator are rejected. Best Phil -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 13:24:48 +0200 (CEST) > Von: natalie.stata@web.de > An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > Betreff: st: No valid instruments for system GMM > Dear statalist, > > I would like to estimate an agricultural production function using panel > data of approximately 20,000 individuals over 20 years. Applying system GMM > - due to unobserved heterogeneity and simultaneity (inputs and output are > determined together e.g. due to profit-maximizing behaviour of the firm), I > estimate the following: > > xtabond2 y l.y x1 x2 x3 x4 x5, robust gmm(y x4 x5) iv(x1 x2 x3) > small noconst > > where y is output (crop yields), x1-x3 (e.g. weather) are strictly > exogenous input variables and x4-x5 are endogenous variables (e.g. fertilisers). > Furthermore, I added a lagged dependent variable on the right-hand side as > it is highly significant. This specification passes the autocorrelation > tests, but not the Sargan test of valid instruments. If I, however, specify > using lag (18 19) (the maximum nr. of lags possible for my dataset) it passes > the Sargan test at the 5% level, but do not obtain any significant > estimates, except for the lagged dependent variable: > > xtabond2 y l.y x1 x2 x3 x4 x5, lag(18 19) robust gmm(y x4 x5) > iv(x1 x2 x3) small noconst > > Is there any systematic way of finding valid instruments for the system > GMM? Or is there another estimator that I can use to handle simultaneity > where I don't need instruments from outside the dataset (I know there is one > called "opreg" from Olley and Pakes, but I need to specifiy exit of a firm > which is not included in my data). > > I would greatly appreciate any comments on this problem! > > Best regards, > Natalie > ___________________________________________________________ > Schon gehört? WEB.DE hat einen genialen Phishing-Filter in die > Toolbar eingebaut! http://produkte.web.de/go/toolbar > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ -- NEU: FreePhone - 0ct/min Handyspartarif mit Geld-zurück-Garantie! Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/