Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: Correct Way to Respond to Posts when Email is Turned Off
From
Phil Schumm <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: RE: Correct Way to Respond to Posts when Email is Turned Off
Date
Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:41:34 -0500
On 7/29/2011 2:19 PM, Philip Jones wrote:
> Speaking of web forums, what is the reason that Statalist hasn't migrated from its LISTSERV origins to a modern, threaded, easy-to-track-what-you've-read web forum? I believe there is a good reason that most discussion sites now use something like UBB or the like.
On Jul 29, 2011, at 1:49 PM, Marcello Pagano wrote:
> We almost did a few years ago, but it was a little premature then and we would have lost a few folks with less modern equipment. Maybe we should reconsider. Any negative votes?? Don't give me the positives, I think I know them.
-1 from me (though I would love to see us move from Majordomo to Mailman). My primary reasons for this are:
1) I realize that this is a personal decision, but I vastly prefer to consume Statalist in my email client (for many reasons).
2) I think it would be a mistake to base Statalist solely on a "pull" technology (i.e., requiring you to go to the web to read it), and email is by far the "push" technology with which most people are familiar.
3) Although some web-based discussion services will let you send (and receive) email, they often clobber messages in the process (e.g., hard-wrap, add formatting or other cruft, etc.).
It's worth noting that even today, the standard for open-source software collaboration (e.g., SourceForge, GitHub, Bitbucket, etc.) is to use a standard mailing list (in combination of course with a version control system, bug/issue tracker, Wiki, etc.).
I wouldn't be strongly opposed to moving to something that provided a web-based interface (e.g., the non-Usenet variety of Google Groups), as long as it provided all of the functionality we have currently (i.e., ability to send and receive email without munging the headers and/or body).
-- Phil
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/