Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "Rourke O'Brien" <rourke.obrien@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: oglm and heterogeneous choice models |
Date | Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:12:55 -0400 |
Great! Thanks for your help! I have fit using hetprob and got the same results as oglm, link(probit). Thanks again! On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Richard Williams <richardwilliams.ndu@gmail.com> wrote: > At 03:33 PM 7/23/2011, Rourke O'Brien wrote: >> >> I am currently running logit models predicting success (dichotomous) >> with sex and income as main predictors. I understand that with >> potential unequal variances across groups I should explore >> heterogeneous choice models. See: >> http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam/oglm/RW_Hetero_Choice.pdf > > Incidentally, since success is dichotomous, you could also use -hetprob-. It > will (hopefully) give the same results as oglm with link(probit). But > (somewhat to my annoyance) I have found that official Stata commands tend to > be way faster than my commands are when estimating the same models. > > > ------------------------------------------- > Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology > OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463 > HOME: (574)289-5227 > EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu > WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/