Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: superscript in SMCL
From
Eric Booth <[email protected]>
To
"<[email protected]>" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: superscript in SMCL
Date
Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:07:12 +0000
<>
As far as I can tell, it only works as text in graphs (see -help graph text-).
- Eric
__
Eric A. Booth
Public Policy Research Institute
Texas A&M University
[email protected]
On Jul 21, 2011, at 8:36 AM, Ricardo Ovaldia wrote:
> I will lide to use superscript on a display line. Is there a way to do this?
>
> I tryed a couplr of things but they do not work:
>
> . di " x {superscript:2}"
> x {superscript:2}
>
> . di "{&function} x {superscript:2}"
> {&function} x {superscript:2}
>
>
> Thank you,
> Ricardo
>
> Ricardo Ovaldia, MS
> Statistician
> Oklahoma City, OK
>
>
> --- On Wed, 7/20/11, Ángel Rodríguez Laso <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> From: Ángel Rodríguez Laso <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: st: Two factor anova post test
>> To: [email protected]
>> Date: Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 3:54 PM
>> Sorry I misunderstood which factor
>> was significant.
>>
>> I cannot give you any advice on carrying out post hoc tests
>> in ANOVA
>> in Stata, that is one answer to your question, because I
>> haven't done
>> any. But maybe this link can give you some clues:
>>
>> http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/faq/pairwise.htm
>>
>> Best regars,
>>
>> Angel Rodriguez-Laso
>>
>> 2011/7/19 Ricardo Ovaldia <[email protected]>:
>>> Thank you Angel. The term that is significant is race,
>> with three levels, therefore I am not completely sure which
>> means are different, and I do not understand how to use
>> -test-, or even if that is the correct way to compare
>> them.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Ricardo.
>>>
>>> Ricardo Ovaldia, MS
>>> Statistician
>>> Oklahoma City, OK
>>>
>>>
>>> --- On Mon, 7/18/11, Ángel Rodríguez Laso <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: Ángel Rodríguez Laso <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: Re: st: Two factor anova post test
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Date: Monday, July 18, 2011, 4:05 PM
>>>> Dear Ricardo;
>>>>
>>>> If you were having many factors and many
>> interactions, you
>>>> should be
>>>> worried about and incresed alpha error level for
>> the
>>>> F-test, but with
>>>> 2 factors I doubt this is a problem. Moreover,
>> your p level
>>>> for the
>>>> significance of sex is far away from the
>> conventional 0.05,
>>>> while the
>>>> interaction sex*race is non-significant. Therefore
>> you can
>>>> conclude
>>>> that there is a significant difference only
>> between sexes.
>>>> Because
>>>> there are only two levels, there is no need to
>> carry out
>>>> any posthoc
>>>> test like Scheffe, because you already know which
>> means are
>>>> different,
>>>> those of men and women.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Angel Rodriguez-Laso
>>>>
>>>> 2011/7/18 Ricardo Ovaldia <[email protected]>:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I performed a two factor ANOVA; one factor
>> (sex) has 2
>>>> levels and the other factor (race) has 3 levels.
>> The
>>>> interaction term is not significant but one of the
>> factors,
>>>> race, is (p=0.0004). How can I determine which
>> means are
>>>> different while maintaining the experiment wise
>> type I error
>>>> rate.
>>>>>
>>>>> If I had only one factor, I could use
>> -oneway- and
>>>> then use, for example, scheffe for multiple
>> comparisons. But
>>>> not sure what to do with two factors.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you in advance,
>>>>> Ricardo
>>>>>
>>>>> Ricardo Ovaldia, MS
>>>>> Statistician
>>>>> Oklahoma City, OK
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *
>>>>> * For searches and help try:
>>>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>>>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>>>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *
>>>> * For searches and help try:
>>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>>>
>>>
>>> *
>>> * For searches and help try:
>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>>
>>
>> *
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/