Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Re: interpret dydx as probabilities after logistic or xtlogit
From
"Seyi Soremekun" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: Re: interpret dydx as probabilities after logistic or xtlogit
Date
Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:43:22 +0100
excellent, thanks Maarten!
thought it might be something elementary....
Seyi
>>> Maarten Buis <[email protected]> 7/11/2011 1:09 PM >>>
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Seyi Soremekun wrote:
> I have a model with a categorical (binary) by continuous interaction, which I estimate using logistic regression or RE logistic regression thus:
<snip>
> odds ratio for quintile (when intvn==0) = 0.4446739
> dydx for quintile (over intvn when =0) = -0.1383194, exponentiated to 0.87
You do not exponentiate marginal effects but interpret them directly
as reported, so a unit change in quintile when intvn == 0 leads to a
decrease in probability of 14 percentage points (-0.1383194 * 100% =
-14%).
Hope this helps,
Maarten
--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/