Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: how can I create deciles by group?
From
Argyn Kuketayev <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: RE: how can I create deciles by group?
Date
Wed, 6 Jul 2011 19:44:46 -0400
Nick
in original paper they'd have stub3 variable continuous, which they
would slice into deciles, then compute the actual failure rates within
these deciles and show on Y-axis. that's why they call it decile plot.
in my case, stub3 is discrete, so i don't really need deciles, but
simply groups by stub3. hence, you're right there's no deciles in my
problem, but it's very similar, and i thought the solution would be
the same. i thought there would eb a standard plot called "decile
plot", which i'd plug my data into and get a nice graph
cheers
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry, Argyn, but this makes no sense to me. Where are the deciles?
>
> Nick
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Argyn Kuketayev
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Nick
>>
>> i'm still having trouble to make it work.
>>
>> i have the variable "stub3", which shows the probability of failure.
>> then i have a variable called "dq", which indicates failures with
>> value 1, and 0 if no failure.
>>
>> so i want to build a decile plot, where on X-axis - stub3, and in
>> Y-axis - the "actual" failure rate in this group.
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I drew attention to an -egen- function written by Uli Kohler in that thread.
>>>
>>> Nick
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Argyn Kuketayev
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Nick
>>>>
>>>> I didn't like the solution with a loop. I'm going to try -egen- solution.
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying to reproduce the Figure 4 in this paper
>>>> http://grimshawville.byu.edu/ddmm.pdf
>>>>
>>>> cheers
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> What's wrong with those answers?
>>>>>
>>>>> Nick
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Argyn Kuketayev
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> is there a better way than describes in this thread?
>>>>>> http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2007-07/msg00469.html
>>> *
>>> * For searches and help try:
>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Argyn Kuketayev
>>
>> *
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
--
Argyn Kuketayev
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/