Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Treatreg with probit
From
John Antonakis <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Treatreg with probit
Date
Wed, 06 Jul 2011 08:40:48 +0200
Perfect! Just what I wanted. Thanks Guy (and Austin).
Best,
J.
__________________________________________
Prof. John Antonakis
Faculty of Business and Economics
Department of Organizational Behavior
University of Lausanne
Internef #618
CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny
Switzerland
Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305
http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis
Associate Editor
The Leadership Quarterly
__________________________________________
On 06.07.2011 00:07, Guy Grossman wrote:
John -
I have also found quite useful the working paper by Chiburis, Das, and
Lokshin (2010) "A Practical Comparison of the Bivariate Probit and
Linear IV Estimators" https://webspace.utexas.edu/rcc485/www/code.html
In addition, if you follow the link the authors provide wrapper for
biprobit (biprobtreat command which allows calculating ATT and ATE).
HTH,
Guy
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Austin Nichols<[email protected]> wrote:
John Antonakis<[email protected]>:
You have a binary outcome and a single binary endogenous variable?
With excluded instruments?
This is sometimes called the triangular simultaneous equation model,
and -biprobit- handles it, as does -cmp-.
Do not manually include a hazard estimate in a second stage probit!
N.B. Heckman-type models with some missing outcomes are essentially
equivalent to treatment-effect-type models;
compare methods and formulas in e.g. [R] treatreg and [R] heckman,
esp. for two-step estimators--
one augments the regression with the first-stage hazard (generalized
residual) in either case.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 5:18 PM, John Antonakis<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi:
Yip; I know of -cmp- and have recommended it in the past to others. It does
do Heckman-type tobit models (with censoring on y), though it doesn't seem
to me that it can do treatment effect-type models (where y is observed in
the treated and non-treated group)--or did I misread the help file?
Best,
J.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/