Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "Jesper Lindhardsen" <JESLIN01@geh.regionh.dk> |
To | <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | st: RE: Using macros and batch running. |
Date | Sun, 3 Jul 2011 22:17:18 +0200 |
Hi Adrian Perhaps use -do- instead of -include-, as you can specify arguments with the -do- command (see -help do-) BW Jesper -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu on behalf of Adrian Sayers Sent: Sat 02/07/2011 12:21 To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: Using macros and batch running. Hi All, I was wondering if anyone can offer some advice? I am trying to run some simulations, and splitting them up into pieces and using the batch mode might make things a lot quicker, especially if i am using a cluster. I am trying to do. forvalues i = 1/2 { winexec "\\myserverstata11\StataMP.exe" -e include batch.do } Where batch.do contains clear all set obs 10000 gen id = _n gen var1 = `i' save batch`i'.dta , replace i seem to have trouble transferring the local macros in one activation of stata to another activation. I was hoping someone would know a workaround for this problem. Many thanks in advance Adrian ____________________________________________ Adrian Sayers Medical Statistician University of Bristol School of Social and Community Medicine, Canynge Hall 39 Whatley Road Bristol BS8 2PS United Kingdom Adrian.Sayers@bristol.ac.uk * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
<<winmail.dat>>