Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: MP Performance for Structural Equation Models in Stata 12
From
Eric Booth <[email protected]>
To
"<[email protected]>" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: MP Performance for Structural Equation Models in Stata 12
Date
Sat, 2 Jul 2011 14:02:20 +0000
<>
William Gould made some remarks about the speed of -sem- the other day on SL:
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2011-06/msg01180.html
- Eric
__
Eric A. Booth
Public Policy Research Institute
Texas A&M University
[email protected]
On Jul 2, 2011, at 7:19 AM, William Robert Buchanan wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I was just looking through the MP performance report on Stata's website
> (http://stata.com/statamp/report.pdf) and was wondering if anyone had any
> idea regarding performance with the new version of the software. Like a few
> other users, I would love nothing more than to get rid of the SEM software
> that I have if I can fit the models in Stata. That being said, I was
> wondering what kind of efficiency gains there are for the different flavors
> of Stata MP with respect to fitting - sem - models? I think it would also
> be great if there was information available comparing the processing time of
> the different SEM software (i.e., EQS, M-Plus, LISREL, AMOS, etc...) with
> the - sem - command in Stata 12.
>
> I was also wondering if there have been any improvements to the way Stata 12
> will handle - gllamm - compared to previous releases.
>
> Thanks,
> Billy Buchanan
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/