Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "Benedikt Link" <benediktlink@gmx.de> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | st: Binary explanatory variable that vaires by country and country fixed effects |
Date | Mon, 16 May 2011 16:38:32 +0200 |
Hello, I have a question concerning binary explanatories and country fixed effects. I am currently running a cross-sectional regression across 15 European countries. My key explanatory variable is a dummy variable (XY) that varies by country (The variable is 1 if certain reporting standards are mandatory in the respective country and 0 otherwise). In order to determine what characteristics of XY drive the effect, I split the variable into two groups, XY_a and XY_b (XY_a is 1 if the country fulfills a certain characteristic (e.g. above median earnings management) and 0 otherwise; XY_b is 1 if the country fulfills XY but XY_a is 0, otherwise it is 0. I also include a range of controls and country fixed effects. I run the following regression: reg depvar XY_a XY_b controls country_*, vce(cluster countryid) Now, my problem is, that no matter according to which characteristc I divide XY into XY_a and XY_b, always one of the coefficients/t-stats of either XY_a or XY_b is exaxcly the same across the different regressions using various defintions of XY_a and XY_b. This seems to me as if Stata has a certain degree of scaling/standardization that always brings back the coefficient of one of the explanatories to the same level and only changes all others. Is this normal or is this a sign for something being misspecified (e.g., mulicollinearity)? Thanks for your help! I appreciate it a lot! Benedikt -- NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren und surfen! Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/