Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Remarks and questions on the VEC function
From
Charles Koss <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Remarks and questions on the VEC function
Date
Mon, 2 May 2011 09:11:22 -0500
May be this link can help
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2011-04/msg00326.html
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Steve06 <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
> i've tried Stata's VEC command to estimate a vector error correction model
> with one co-integrating equation.
> Here's what I found:
> - all reported significance statistics are Z-statistics, while in published
> empirical work you find t-statistics. I did not find a switch to change it
> but would find it a good idea to have.
> - if you specify a constant, you have it in both the main model and in the
> cointegrating equation. If you specify no constant, it's neither in the main
> model nor in the coint. equation, which is annoying, since you might want to
> have a constant in the coint. equation but not in the main model.
>
> Any suggestions how to overcome these limitations? Are there alternative VEC
> functions by the Stata community? (like Xtabond2 vs Xtabond)
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://statalist.1588530.n2.nabble.com/Remarks-and-questions-on-the-VEC-function-tp6318458p6318458.html
> Sent from the Statalist mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/