Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Re: weak identification in ivreg2
From
Christopher Baum <[email protected]>
To
Xuelian Zhang <[email protected]>
Subject
st: Re: weak identification in ivreg2
Date
Sat, 30 Apr 2011 07:54:05 -0400
<>
On Apr 29, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Xuelian Zhang wrote:
> Hi Christopher F Baum,
>
> I run ivreg2 with 5 endogenous variables instrumented by 10 IVs, and the ivreg2 reports the Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic as 1.250, and doesn't report the Stock-Yogo critical values, then do you know how to tell whether my instruments are weak instruments?
>
> Many thanks.
>
> Best,
> Xuelian Zhang
>
> Economics Department
> Rutgers University
Please read the ivreg2 help file:
Stock and Yogo (2005) have compiled critical
values for the Cragg-Donald F statistic for several different estimators (IV, LIML, Fuller-LIML), several different definitions of
"perform poorly" (based on bias and test size), and a range of configurations (up to 100 excluded instruments and up to 2 or 3
endogenous regressors, depending on the estimator). ivreg2 will report the Stock-Yogo critical values if these are available;
missing values mean that the critical values haven't been tabulated or aren't applicable. See Stock and Yogo (2002, 2005) for
details.
Kit Baum | Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin | http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
An Introduction to Stata Programming | http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html
An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata | http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/