Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Robson Glasscock <glasscockrc@vcu.edu> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: xtfmb: Fama MacBeth regression - High average R2, but no significant coefficients |
Date | Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:02:44 -0400 |
Hi Alex, Have you looked at the correlation between your regressors? It sounds to me like a classic case of multicollinearity (aka micronumerosity =>). On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Alexander v. Angerer <avangerer@web.de> wrote: > Hello, > > I was conducting a Fama MacBeth regression using xtfmb to test wether three betas on factor portfolios are able to explain the cross sectional variation in portfolio returns. > > None of the three (average time series) beta coefficients was significant while the average R squared of all cross sections was above 70%. What could be the problem here? > > Best regards, > > Alex > > > ___________________________________________________________ > WEB.DE DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 €/mtl.! Jetzt mit > gratis Handy-Flat! http://produkte.web.de/go/DSL_Doppel_Flatrate/2 > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/