Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Box-Tidwell Test
From
[email protected]
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Box-Tidwell Test
Date
Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:57:12 +0200
Hi
Ok I will try this. But I have another questions regarding testing the
linearity assumption. Another way to check is the Locally Weigthed
Scatterplot Smoothed (lowess) and the literature says that graphs with
u- shaped and not continues shapes contravene the assumption.
I tried the test with:
lowess wabsunion themen, jitter(2) bwidth(.2)
and got as a result, a straight line, with some slope. It is for sure
not s-shaped form as it is supposed to be, yet it is not u-shaped and
continuous. So is it ok to write that the linearity assumption is ok?
I know the case is special as I have 2 dummy variables with values
(0-1), so its seems logical not to have a s-shaped graph, but I have
to write something about linearity.
I am very sorry, i know my questions must seem totally stupid but this
is the first time I use STATA and regression analysis.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/