Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: different handling if missings in programs using syntax varlist [if}
From
Bjorn Van Campenhout <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: different handling if missings in programs using syntax varlist [if}
Date
Thu, 21 Apr 2011 23:55:54 +0200
Dear statalist,
I have observed different outcomes when I have missing observations in
programs that use the if qualifier. I was wondering what logic is behind
this.
Here is a self-contained example:
sysuse auto
replace price=. if foreign==1
cap pro drop foo
pro def foo
syntax varlist
gen comment="this is only a test"
end
cap pro drop foobar
pro def foobar
syntax varlist [if]
marksample touse
gen comment="this is only a test" if `touse'
end
foo price
drop comment
foobar price
For those who wonder, I am trying to make a program that reports
missings and want to be able to use conditions in my function calls.
Kind regards,
Bjorn
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/