Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: svylogitgof: changes dramatically across models using the same pooled sample
From
Steven Samuels <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: svylogitgof: changes dramatically across models using the same pooled sample
Date
Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:08:44 -0400
--
I forgot my own advice earlier to use the -if- option, Richard. It often makes little difference and I can't get excited by a slight under-estimate, if any, for the p-value of a goodness-of-fit statistic. The null hypothesis (perfect fit?) isn't realistic to begin with.
Steve
On Apr 12, 2011, at 11:35 PM, Richard Williams wrote:
At 07:53 PM 4/12/2011, Steven Samuels wrote:
> Eileen, I assume that you're on Stata 11, since you don't say otherwise. -svylogitgof- doesn't work with subpop() options and has other problems in Stata 11.
>
> See: http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2011-03/msg00442.html
>
> Steve
> [email protected]
Last I remember seeing, getting -estat gof- to work with the subpop option was on the Stata development list:
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2011-03/msg00555.html
I wonder how terrible it would be if you used the -if- option instead of -subpop-? I know that is frowned upon, but if the alternative is to do nothing at all, which is better?
-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME: (574)289-5227
EMAIL: [email protected]
WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/