Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | Steven Samuels <sjsamuels@gmail.com> |
| To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
| Subject | Re: st: svylogitgof: changes dramatically across models using the same pooled sample |
| Date | Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:08:44 -0400 |
-- I forgot my own advice earlier to use the -if- option, Richard. It often makes little difference and I can't get excited by a slight under-estimate, if any, for the p-value of a goodness-of-fit statistic. The null hypothesis (perfect fit?) isn't realistic to begin with. Steve On Apr 12, 2011, at 11:35 PM, Richard Williams wrote: At 07:53 PM 4/12/2011, Steven Samuels wrote: > Eileen, I assume that you're on Stata 11, since you don't say otherwise. -svylogitgof- doesn't work with subpop() options and has other problems in Stata 11. > > See: http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2011-03/msg00442.html > > Steve > sjsamuels@gmail.com Last I remember seeing, getting -estat gof- to work with the subpop option was on the Stata development list: http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2011-03/msg00555.html I wonder how terrible it would be if you used the -if- option instead of -subpop-? I know that is frowned upon, but if the alternative is to do nothing at all, which is better? ------------------------------------------- Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463 HOME: (574)289-5227 EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/