Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | John Antonakis <John.Antonakis@unil.ch> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: RE: e(sample) after xtivreg2 |
Date | Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:53:56 +0200 |
Hi: See also: http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2003-06/msg00646.html Best, J. __________________________________________ Prof. John Antonakis Faculty of Business and Economics Department of Organizational Behavior University of Lausanne Internef #618 CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny Switzerland Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438 Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305 http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis Associate Editor The Leadership Quarterly __________________________________________ On 12.04.2011 16:37, Chris Parker wrote:
Interesting analysis, Austin. Thanks to everyone who helped me work through this issue! Chris Chris Parker ________________________________ PhD Candidate | Management Science& Operations London Business School | Regent's Park | London NW1 4SA | United Kingdom Direct line +44 (0)20 7000 8816 | Email cparker.phd2007@london.edu On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Austin Nichols<austinnichols@gmail.com> wrote:So I answered my own question by experiment: the singletons are excluded by both -xtreg- and -xtivreg2- for FE estimates of coefs, but included for the constant term reported by -xtreg- and also affect the F-test that all u_i are zero which seems questionable at best for most applications. So I would recommend Chris exclude the singletons with an -if- qualifier e.g. webuse grunfeld, clear replace mval=. if (com>8)&(time!=10) qui xtreg mval inv, fe g byte s=e(sample) egen c=sum(s), by(company) xtreg mval inv if c>1, fe On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Austin Nichols<austinnichols@gmail.com> wrote:Chris: See also e.g. http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2008-11/msg00260.html Mark: Are the singletons used in calculating SEs? I.e. is the variation around the group mean (=zero) in a singleton averaged together with other groups to estimate residual variance? It is the case that if you estimate a first difference model in a bunch of data where the first differences are often zero (suppose the X variables change at most once in each panel but there are 20 time periods) that the estimated coefficients will be the same as if you had restricted to those obs where the difference is nonzero, but the standard errors may differ substantially. The difference may matter a lot, in terms of radically different inferences drawn, but which set of estimates you want depends a bit on your philosophical outlook about the residuals. On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Chris Parker <cparker.phd2007@london.edu> wrote:Mark, Thanks for the clarification. Yes, I agree that singletons cannot be used because the FE wipes them out. I guess I'm just a little confused by xtivreg2 including singletons in e(sample) when they are not used in the regression itself as evidenced by the decrease in number of obs in the output. Chris On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Schaffer, Mark E<M.E.Schaffer@hw.ac.uk> wrote:Chris, To answer your specific question below:Can someone explain what is going on here? Is xtivreg2 actually using the 172 observations or not?-xtivreg2- includes the 172 singletons in e(sample). But of course the FE (or FD) transformation effectively wipes these out, because there's no within-group variation when there's only one observation in the group. -xtivreg2- warns about this. -xtreg- also does not - cannot! - use singletons to estimate the slope coefficients with the FE estimator. However, -xtreg- reports a constant term, and if I'm not mistaken, it *does* use the singletons for estimating that. I hope this clarifies things. Cheers, Mark* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System on behalf of the London Business School community. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/