Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Re: Interaction and squared effects in a probit (pa) model
From
Maarten buis <[email protected]>
To
stata list <[email protected]>
Subject
st: Re: Interaction and squared effects in a probit (pa) model
Date
Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:56:37 +0100 (BST)
--- On Mon, 11/4/11, Gomez-Mera, Laura wrote:
> We are still not sure how to deal with the marginal effects
> of interacted terms (between two continuous variables) in
> our xtgee model. Norton's 'inteff' seems to work for probit
> models with interaction terms but can it be used when we are
> working with panel data?
I understand from your previous question that you have a
special kind of interaction: a squared term. In that case
you typically do not want the marginal effect. A marginal
effect approximates the effect with a linear effect. If you
added a square term you think that there is substantial
non-linearity, so the linear approximation is not
appropriate. Having said that, -margins- will give you the
"correct but inappropriate" marginal effect, so there is no
need for -inteff- to interpret squared terms.
Hope this helps,
Maarten
--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/