st: RE: limitations of "generate" with missing data

["Fernando Rios Avila" <f.rios.a@gmail.com>]

Hi Michael,
The limitation is not with generate. But rather with the way u are creating
your dummy variable
I think this should do the trick

 set obs 1000
gen r=runiform()
 replace  r=. if runiform()>.5
 gen r2=r>0.7 if r1!=.


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
[mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Costello
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 6:01 PM
To: statalist
Subject: st: limitations of "generate" with missing data

Statalisters,

I recently ran into a problem with the following dataset:

. tab  gread_comp_score_pcnt, m
gread_comp_ |
 score_pcnt |      Freq.     Percent        Cum.
------------+-----------------------------------
          0 |        150        7.50        7.50
         .2 |         85        4.25       11.75
         .4 |         97        4.85       16.60
         .6 |         82        4.10       20.70
         .8 |         72        3.60       24.30
          1 |         15        0.75       25.05
          . |      1,499       74.95      100.00
------------+-----------------------------------
      Total |      2,000      100.00

The high number of "missing" is by design, a by-product of a horizontally
structured dataset that I have yet to rectify.

When I run the command:
gen gread_comp_score_pcnt80= (gread_comp_score_pcnt>.79) I am left with

. tab  gread_comp_score_pcnt80, m
gread_comp_ |
score_pcnt8 |
          0 |      Freq.     Percent        Cum.
------------+-----------------------------------
          0 |        414       20.70       20.70
          1 |      1,586       79.30      100.00
------------+-----------------------------------
      Total |      2,000      100.00

As you can see, the 87 values above .79 were set to 1, but so were all the
missing values!!  I have toyed with the code a bit, trying variations such
as . gen gread_comp_score_pcnt80= (gread_comp_score_pcnt>.79 &
gread_comp_score_pcnt!=.)
but that converts all the missing to 0's, which is only marginally better.

So the question is, is there some way to use a single, precise line of code
to create eighty-seven 1's, four hundred fourteen  0's and 1499 Missing
values in one dummy variable?  I know I can do it with several lines of
code, but I'm looking for something more concise, as it needs to run many
hundreds of times.

Thanks for your help,
-Michael
--
Michael Costello
MS Candidate, Statistics 2011
202-246-1627
Linked In
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/