Re: st: Areg, absorb

[emanuele mazzini <madsoenistata@gmail.com>]

Then do you think I can keep the estimates for the dummies now and
drop them later on, when I'll be exporting the resulting table in
another format (for instance, latex)?

Thank you.


2011/4/11 Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>:
> I think this is likely to be well addressed by using the -estimates-
> suite of commands, in which you use -estimates table- with -keep()- or
> -drop()- as needed after -regress-.
>
> There is likely to be something similar with various user-written
> commands. People who use any of those commands are likely to have
> precise advice.
>
> Nick
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:32 PM, emanuele mazzini
> <madsoenistata@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am trying to work out a regression with panel data in which I have
>> to control for country1, country2 and year.
>> I tried to ran a regression after creating a dummy for all three of
>> them and obviously in the result Stata reports the estimates of all
>> the dummies I created which I do not want to show in the output of the
>> regression. I tried to get the same result with the command: areg...,
>> absorb(varname)  but the point is that areg does not allow me to
>> include more than one variable, and in this case I would need three.
>> Hence, my brief question is: is there a way to include in the
>> regression the fixed effects for country1, country2 and year without
>> Stata showing all the coefficients of the dummies I create?
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/