Re: st: ETA Stata 12.0

[Charles Koss <hqtiger@gmail.com>]

Thank you Dr. Airey and you are welcome as well. As my high school
teacher would say "playing with numbers is so different than working
with them." I am sure that most economists would agree with it.
Anyway, I think we have high expectations for the things we hold
dearly.

Sincerely,

Charles

-- 
Charles Koss
http://charlesonnet.blogspot.com

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Airey, David C
<david.airey@vanderbilt.edu> wrote:
> .
>
> Interesting point. Thanks.
>
> No doubt there are other improvements and wishes.
>
>> Well well! Since starting to use Stata, I am very impressed how much
>> have learnt. Since we always want to purchase better products, I hope
>> Stata 12 can produce complete inference for Vector Error Correction
>> Models (vec command).
>>
>> Currently, Stata 10 and 11 can produce the estimates for the impulse
>> response functions but it CAN NOT estimate the corresponding standard
>> errors. So, those estimates are useless since WE DO NEED the standard
>> errors for interpreting the results STATISTICALLY. I was amazed to
>> learn that OPEN SOURCE software can do that job very efficiently. I
>> would like to see this feature in STATA 12.
>>
>> With this feature, I can convince myself and the administrators that
>> the purchase of Stata 12 is worthy, although version 11 is much better
>> than 10. If someone has information that contradicts my opinion,
>> please do share it.  See:
>>
>> http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2011-03/msg01435.html
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Charles
>>
>
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/