Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: xtregar, fe lbi


From   Marie-Claire Robitaille-Blanchet <[email protected]>
To   "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject   RE: st: xtregar, fe lbi
Date   Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:18:45 +0800

Thanks Scott!

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott Merryman
Sent: Wednesday, 6 April 2011 8:50 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: xtregar, fe lbi

See  http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2010-09/msg01406.html


Scott

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Marie-Claire Robitaille-Blanchet <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to use the command xtregar, fe lbi but I am unsure how to interpret the modified Bhargava et al. Durbin-Watson and Baltagi-Wu LBI...
>
> The results I obtain are:
>
> modified Bhargava et al. Durbin-Watson = .97208012 Baltagi-Wu LBI = 
> 1.7745588
>
> I have 165 obs and 60 groups.
>
> Does anyone know how to interpret those results? Any reference I can use?
>
> Thanks
>
> Marie-Claire
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index