Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: lagged dependent variable
From
Humaira Asad <[email protected]>
To
STATA HELP <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: lagged dependent variable
Date
Sun, 3 Apr 2011 19:00:30 +0000
Thank you Clive!
Humaira Asad
PhD Research Scholar
UoE Business School
University of Exeter, England
----------------------------------------
> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 19:11:09 +0100
> Subject: Re: st: lagged dependent variable
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
>
> Humaira Asad wrote:
>
> > I have seen some papers where people have used xtfevd or xtpcse with lagged dependent variables. Is it legitimate to use LDV's in these estimators.
>
> You've already asked a version of this question before. I was one of
> those who answered it, posting a link to a 2004 paper by Beck and Katz
> saying that it was okay for -xtpcse-. See
> http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2011-03/msg00365.html
>
> Please do yourself (and everybody else) a favour by checking the
> Statalist archives before posting.
>
> > Plus, is it alright to use xtfevd?
>
> That probably doesn't matter if you can get your model to work
> satisfactorily in -xtpcse-.
>
> --
> Clive Nicholas
>
> [Please DO NOT mail me personally here, but at
> . Please respond to contributions I make in
> a list thread here. Thanks!]
>
> "My colleagues in the social sciences talk a great deal about
> methodology. I prefer to call it style." -- Freeman J. Dyson
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/