Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
re:RE: st: xtabond2 year dummies
From
Christopher Baum <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
re:RE: st: xtabond2 year dummies
Date
Fri, 1 Apr 2011 11:52:54 -0400
<>
> Yes! you are absolutely right, so what should I do. I mean what should I report as the results?
That is something to discuss with your advisor. If you were working with me, I would suggest that you are trying to explain something at, e.g., the firm level that does not seem to have much to do with explanatory factors at the firm level, but is rather almost completely explained by macro effects. Your model suggesting that firm-level factors (or whatever the units are in your panel) play a significant role does not receive support from the data.
Kit Baum | Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin | http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
An Introduction to Stata Programming | http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html
An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata | http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/