Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Why does Stata tell me that Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian?
From
Charles Koss <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Why does Stata tell me that Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian?
Date
Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:38:40 -0500
Take a look at the last paragraphs of this page
http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/xtreg.html
--
Charles Koss
http://charlesonnet.blogspot.com
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 2:07 PM, alejandro lopez-feldman
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a question about the Stata output after xtreg, re. My question
> is very simple, why does Stata tell me that Random effects u_i ~
> Gaussian? The theory for estimating random effects using GLS doesn't
> require the normality assumption so I was wondering if that is used in
> any of the output reported when using , re? I can't see why that info
> is relevant there (if I was using MLE that would be other story).
>
> Thanks for any help
>
> Alejandro
>
>
>
> --
> -------------------------
> Alejandro López-Feldman
> Profesor-Investigador
> CIDE, División de Economía
> +(52) 5727-98-00 ext. 2736
> http://www.cide.edu/investigador/profile.php?IdInvestigador=1195
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/