Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> |
| To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
| Subject | Re: st: RE: Partially suppressing output |
| Date | Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:13:12 +0100 |
Create those few explicitly beforehand rather than rely on Stata generating them on the fly. Then you know their names. Nick On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Dmitriy Krichevskiy <krichevskyd@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have a small question (as an extension of the one below): While I > have large number of dummy variables that I do not want to see I also > have a few for which I do want to see the output. To avoid having > large output I use -quietly- followed by -estimates store- followed by > -estimates table- with keep( ) option suggested by Nick. However, I > have an issue where the dummies that I don't want to keep are recoded > by stata into _varname_# where I do not know what the # is. Is there > a way to have stata display all _varname_# regardless of how the > program coded it? > P.S. I get coefficient _Icorp_# does not occur in any of the models error. > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> wrote: >> >> Look at the -help- for -estimates table-, particularly its -drop()- and -keep()- options. >> >> Nick >> n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk >> >> Dmitriy Krichevskiy >> >> I am running a regression (on Stata 11) which includes a large number >> of dummy variables. I want to use them as controls but do not care to >> see the output for those particular variables. Is there a way to >> suppress a particular variable from reported results? * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/